نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The topics of effusion and emanation are fundamental topics in Islamic philosophy and theology, which have had widespread effects in the fields of ontology and philosophical and theological anthropology. This research, which was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, examines and compares the views of two great thinkers of the Islamic world, Fakhr Razi and Allameh Tabataba'i, regarding the conditions and factors affecting effusion and emanation. Both thinkers believe that the realization of divine effusion depends on attributes such as knowledge, power, and non-corporeality, and that abstract beings act as intermediaries for the transmission of effusion to the material world. However, based on his theological principles, especially divine omnipotence and the rule of predestination over human actions, Fakhr al-Razi believes that effusion is bestowed directly from God and that man is only the means to receive it. In contrast, Allama Tabataba'i, by accepting the principle of oneness and emphasizing human will and free will, believes that emanation does not depend solely on divine grace and that humans must create the conditions for benefiting from effusion through their own will and desire. This research ultimately shows that Allameh Tabataba'i's view is more robust due to its clearer and more comprehensive explanation of how divine effusion is realized in the arc of ascent and descent of being.
کلیدواژهها English
