Isra Hikmat

Isra Hikmat

Empathy in the phenomenological tradition

Document Type : tar

Authors
PhD in Islamic Philosophy, Jamiat Al-Mustafa Al-Alamiya
Abstract
In the past few years, there has been a lively debate on whether and how phenomenology can

contribute to social cognition research. Notably, some have doubted whether first-personal,

phenomenological descriptions of intersubjective experience and interaction can support or

disconfirm certain theories about social cognition (e.g., Spaulding 2015). In contrast to such an

assessment, the aim of the present contribution will be to present an overview of the rich and

detailed discussion of empathy found in the phenomenological tradition, focussing particularly

on those aspects of this discussion that we believe to contain important and subtle insights of

contemporary relevance.

Our approach in the following will be as follows. First, we will examine the account of

empathy offered by the two phenomenologists whose writings on the topic we take to be

the richest and clearest, Husserl and Stein, explicating their arguments for the claims that

(i) empathy is a sui generis mode of intentional experience, (ii) the basic form of empathy

can nevertheless be characterised as perception-like, and (iii) that a higher-order form of

empathy is a more imagination-like way of understanding other persons from their own

personal perspective.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Chelstrom, E. (2013) Social Phenomenology: Husserl, Intersubjectivity, and Collective Intentionality, Lanham et al.: Lexington.
  2. Coplan, A. (2011) “Will the Real Empathy Please Stand up? A Case for a Narrow Conceptualization,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49(s1), 40–65.
  3. Goldie, P. (2000) The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Gurwitsch, A. (1931 [1979]) Human Encounters in the Social World, transl. F. Kersten, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
  5. Husserl, E. (1905–20 [1973]) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Erster Teil: 1905–1920, ed. I. Kern, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  6. Husserl, E. (1907 [2010]) Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907, transl. R. Rojcewicz, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  7. Husserl, E. (1912–16 [1989]) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution, transl. R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Dordrecht: Kluwer. [(1952) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, ed. M. Biemel, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.]
  8. Husserl, E. (1915–17 [2016]) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution und Wissenschaftstheorie, ed. D. Fonfara, Dordrecht: Springer.
  9. Husserl, E. (1918–26 [2001]) Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, transl. A. Steinbock, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  10. Husserl, E. (1921–8 [1973]) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928, ed. I. Kern, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  11. Jardine, J. (2015a) “Husserl and Stein on the Phenomenology of Empathy: Perception and Explication,” Synthesis Philosophica 29(2), 273–88.
  12. Jardine, J. (2015b) “Stein and Honneth on Empathy and Emotional Recognition,” Human Studies 38(4), 567–89.
  13. Jardine, J. (2016) “Wahrnehmung und Explikation: Husserl und Stein über die Phänomenologie der Einfühlung,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 64(2), 352–74.
  14. León, F., & Zahavi, D. (2016) “Phenomenology of Experiential Sharing: The Contribution of Schutz and Walther,” in A. Salice & H. B. Schmid (eds.), Social Reality: The Phenomenological Approach, Dordrecht: Springer.
  15. Lipps, T. (1907) “Das Wissen von fremden Ichen,” in T. Lipps (ed.), Psychologische Untersuchungen I, Leipzig: Engelmann.
  16. Lipps, T. (1909) Leitfaden der Psychologie, Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
    Overgaard, S. (2012) “Other People,” in D. Zahavi (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945 [2012]) Phenomenology of Perception, transl. D. A. Landes, London, New York: Routledge.
  18. Salice, A., & Taipale, J. (2015) “Group-Directed Empathy: A Phenomenological Account,” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 46(2), 163–84.
  19. Scheler, M. (1926a [1973]) Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values: A New Attempt Toward the Foundation of an Ethical Personalism, transl. M. S. Frings & R. L. Funk, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  20. Scheler, M. (1926b [1954]) The Nature of Sympathy, transl. P. Heath. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  21. Schütz, A. (1932 [1967]) The Phenomenology of the Social World, transl. G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  22. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974) The Structures of the Life-World, transl. R. M. Zaner & H. Tristram Engelhardt, London: Heinemann.
  23. Spaulding, S. (2015) “Phenomenology of Social Cognition,” Erkenntnis 80(5), 1069–89.
  24. Stein, E. (1917 [1989]) On the Problem of Empathy, transl. W. Stein, Washington, D.C.: ICS Publication [(2008) Zum Problem der Einfühlung, Freiburg: Herder].
  25. Stein, E. (1922 [2000]) Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities, transl. M. C. Baseheart & M. Sawicki, Washington, D.C.: ICS Publication.
  26. Szanto, T. (2015) “Collective Emotions, Normativity, and Empathy: A Steinian Proposal,” Human Studies 38(4), 503–27.
  27. Szanto, T. (2016) “Husserl on Collective Intentionality,” in A. Salice & H. B. Schmid (eds.), Social Reality: The Phenomenological Approach, Dordrecht: Springer.
  28. Szanto, T., & Moran, D. (eds.) (2015) Empathy and Collective Intentionality: The Social Philosophy of Edith Stein, Special Issue: Human Studies 38(4).
  29. Szanto, T., & Moran, D. (eds.) (2016) The Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the ‘We’, London, New York: Routledge.
  30. Taipale, J. (2016) “From Types to Tokens: Empathy and Typifcation,” in T. Szanto & D. Moran (eds.), The Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the ‘We’. London, New York: Routledge.
  31. Titchner, E. B. (1909) Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought-Processes, New York: Macmillan.
  32. Vischer, R. (1873) Über das optische Formgefühl. Ein Beitrag zur Ästhetik. Leipzig: Hermann Credner.
  33. Walther, G. (1923) “Zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften,” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 6, 1–158.
  34. Zahavi, D. (2010) “Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz,” Inquiry 53(3), 285–306.