The central paradigm is a theoretical framework for research in natural and human sciences. In this methodological approach, the place of epistemology and to some extent ontology in the research process is discussed, but anthropology is not independently considered by methodologists. The purpose of this research is to introduce and evaluate the paradigm-oriented approach in research methodology and outline the position of anthropology in methodology. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The findings indicate that since the research methodology is based on epistemology, and according to Allameh Javadi Amoli's opinion, epistemology is related to anthropology, it is necessary to independently consider humans in the methodology. Science should be paid. Anthropological attention puts important capacities in front of scientific knowledge, and the attitude about the nature of science, the method of knowledge and construction of theory is brought more clearly.
لیتل، دنیل (1373)، تبیین در علوم اجتماعی، ترجمه عبدالکریم سروش، تهران، صراط
مجلسی، محمدباقر(1421)، بحارالانوار، ج 75، بیروت، دار التعارف للمطبوعات
محمدپور، احمد، (1396)، روش تحقیق معاصر در علوم انسانی، تهران، ققنوس
Burrell, Gibson & Gareth Morgan. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann.
Feyerabend, Paui.(1975),Against Method: ouline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London, New Left Book.
Goodman, N. (1983) Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press.Hard
Hanson, N. R. (1958), Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
lakatos, I (1970), falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Criticism and the Growth of knowledge, eds. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, cambridge: cambridge Universitiy Press.
Masterman, Margaret, (1970), “the nature of parasigm” in Lakatos, Imre, andAlan Musgrave, eds.
Mills,C.W. (1959), The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Neuman, W.L. (1997). Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Aproaches. Allyn and Bacon pub.
Psillos, S. (2007), “Truthlikeness” in Philosophy of Science A-Z, Edinburgh University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1998), Truth and TruProgress: Philosophical Papers, Volume 3,Cambridge university Press
------------------- (1979), Philosophy and Miror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Scheffler, I. (1967), Science and Subjectivity, New York: Bobbs-Merrill
Wisdom, J.O. (1987). Challengeability in Modern Science. Avebury: Aldershot.
Mesbahi Jamshid,P. and Abdolahi,M. A. (2024). Analyzing the place and function of anthropology in paradigm-oriented methodology. Isra Hikmat, 15(3), 213-246. doi: 10.22034/isra.2024.192245
MLA
Mesbahi Jamshid,P. , and Abdolahi,M. A. . "Analyzing the place and function of anthropology in paradigm-oriented methodology", Isra Hikmat, 15, 3, 2024, 213-246. doi: 10.22034/isra.2024.192245
HARVARD
Mesbahi Jamshid P., Abdolahi M. A. (2024). 'Analyzing the place and function of anthropology in paradigm-oriented methodology', Isra Hikmat, 15(3), pp. 213-246. doi: 10.22034/isra.2024.192245
CHICAGO
P. Mesbahi Jamshid and M. A. Abdolahi, "Analyzing the place and function of anthropology in paradigm-oriented methodology," Isra Hikmat, 15 3 (2024): 213-246, doi: 10.22034/isra.2024.192245
VANCOUVER
Mesbahi Jamshid P., Abdolahi M. A. Analyzing the place and function of anthropology in paradigm-oriented methodology. Isra Hikmat, 2024; 15(3): 213-246. doi: 10.22034/isra.2024.192245