2
Associated Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3
Member of scientific board of sistan and Balouchestan University
Abstract
The design argument is the simplest and most basic argument to prove the existence of God. The simplicity of the argument is attractive and convincing for the general audience. The interpretation based on parable was the simplest interpretation. With the progress of experimental science and empiricism, the argument of design was seriously criticized. Hume''s critiques officially sounded the alarm about the ineffectiveness of this argument. Therefore, the traditional interpretations of the proof of design were severely shaken. The theory of evolution weighed the scales in favor of the critics of the design argument. In the meantime, theologians in the tradition of Western philosophy have arisen with the idea of reforming and reconstructing this argument. Richard Swinburne was among these theologians. By resorting to the distinction between two types of order, the principle of explanation and the principle of simplicity, he has presented an inductive exposition suitable to contemporary scientific discourses and has given new life to the argument of design. In the Islamic world, Javadi Amoli has reconstructed the traditional interpretation based on analogies. Javadi Amoli''s interpretation despite adhering to the traditional method of reasoning, i.e. deductive reasoning in explaining the premises, has tried to solve the problem of induction in observing the order through the present science. The order of genetic , which originates from objectivity and external existence, is justified only based on the principle of causality, and any chance, possibility, and blind coincidence are ruled out.
اصغر محمدی و سحر کاوندی، صورتبندی برهان نظم از منظر سوئینبرن، پژوهشهای هستیشناختی، دو فصلنامه علمی ـ پژوهشی، سال دوم / شماره 4/ پاییز و زمستان 92، ص 108-93.
جواد پورروستایی، بررسی برهان نظم از منظر اندیشمندان اسلامی معاصر، فصلنامه علمی ـ پژوهشی دانشگاه قم، سال یازدهم، شمارۀ سوم و چهارم، خرداد 1389، ص 74-51.
جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1386)، تبیین براهین اثبات خدا، تحقیق: حمید پارسالنیا، قم: مرکز نشر اسراء.
ــــــــــــــــــ ، (1384)، توحید در قرآن، قم: مرکز نشر اسراء.
جیمز، ویلیام (1397)، فرگشت و انتخاب طبیعی واقعگرایانه، تهران: نشر بینالملل.
داکینز، ریچارد، 1399، ساعتساز نابینا، ترجمه شهلا باقری و محمود بهزاد، تهران: انتشارات مازیار.
غزاله حجتی، برهان نظم، تکامل و تنظیم دقیق: بررسی مقایسهای دیدگاههی سوئینبرن و مطهری، فلسفه تحلیلی، شماره 31، بهار و تابستان 1396، ص 23-48.
فرپژوه، فرخ، برهان نظم و مسئله گزینش فزاینده، 9 سپتامبر2009.
https://fargasht.wordpress.com/2009/09/09
مطهری، مرتضی، 1382، مجموعه آثار، تهران، انتشارات صدرا.
هملتون، کریستوفر(1392)، فلسفۀ دین از کتاب فهم فلسفه، مترجم منا موسوی، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
Hume، David (2007)، Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings، ed. by David Coleman، New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant، Immanuel (1983)، Critique of pure Reason، Trans by Norman Kemp Smith، London: Macmillan.
Mackie، John (1982)، The Miracle of Theism، (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Paley، William، Natural Theology، or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity، Collected from the Appearances of Nature، Boston، Gould & Lincoln، 1864، Available at: <https:// iep.utm.edu/design.htm>.
Palmer، William (2001)، The Question Of God، Swinburne’s Design Argument، 137-144. New YORK، Routledge.
Papineau، David، "Naturalism"،The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition)، Edward N. Zalta (ed.)، URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/naturalism/>.
Stephen T. Davis، God، Reason and Theistic Proofs، Edinburgh، Edinburgh University، 1997، 116-119.
Swinburne، Richard، “The Argument from Design”. In: Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (Eds.). philosophy of Rrligion: The Big Questions، Oxford، Blackwell،
safaiemoghadam,Z. , Abasi Hosseinabadi,,H. and noori,E. (2023). Adaptation and evaluation of the interpretation of the proof of design from the point of view of Richard Swinburne and Javadi Ameli. Isra Hikmat, 15(1), 59-89.
MLA
safaiemoghadam,Z. , , Abasi Hosseinabadi,H. , and noori,E. . "Adaptation and evaluation of the interpretation of the proof of design from the point of view of Richard Swinburne and Javadi Ameli", Isra Hikmat, 15, 1, 2023, 59-89.
HARVARD
safaiemoghadam Z., Abasi Hosseinabadi, H., noori E. (2023). 'Adaptation and evaluation of the interpretation of the proof of design from the point of view of Richard Swinburne and Javadi Ameli', Isra Hikmat, 15(1), pp. 59-89.
CHICAGO
Z. safaiemoghadam, H. Abasi Hosseinabadi, and E. noori, "Adaptation and evaluation of the interpretation of the proof of design from the point of view of Richard Swinburne and Javadi Ameli," Isra Hikmat, 15 1 (2023): 59-89,
VANCOUVER
safaiemoghadam Z., Abasi Hosseinabadi, H., noori E. Adaptation and evaluation of the interpretation of the proof of design from the point of view of Richard Swinburne and Javadi Ameli. Isra Hikmat, 2023; 15(1): 59-89.
