Isra Hikmat

Isra Hikmat

Dilthey's Influence on Early Heidegger's Understanding of Life and its Historicality

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Mina Ghajargar 1
Ali Asghar Mosleh 2
Reza Dehghani 3
1 Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
2 Full Professor/ Allameh Tabataba'i University
3 Institution for Humanities and Cultural Studies
Abstract
In various occasions, Heidegger acknowledges the extensive and profound effects of Dilthey on his thought, so that some of Heidegger's scholars believe Dilthey has a greater role than Husserl in the formation of Heidegger's ideas. For instance, in Being and Time, he frequently mentions that his views on life and history are greatly affected by Dilthey's views in these areas. Furthermore, the publication of Heidegger's 1919-1923 lectures has revealed this influence and thematic links between their ideas more than ever. Our aim in this paper is to better understand the relation of Heidegger and Dilthey, especially regarding the subject of analyzing life and historicality and the implications of this influence on early Heidegger.
Keywords
Life
Historicality
Dilthey
Heidegger
Temporality
Lived Experience

  1.  

     

    منابع

    1. دیلتای، ویلهلم. (1388)، مقدمه بر علوم انسانی، ترجمه صانعی دره‌بیدی، منوچهر، نشر ققنوس.
    2. هایدگر، مارتین. (1393)، هستی و زمان، ترجمه رشیدیان، عبدالکریم. نشر نی.

    3.Dilthey, Wilhelm. (1977a). Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding. Trans. Richard M. Zaner and Kenneth L. Heiges. Martinus Nijhoff/ The Hague.

    4.Dilthey, Wilhelm. (1977b). Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. 5:Die geistige Welt. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    5.Dilthey, Wilhelm. (1997). Grundlegung der Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte. Ausarbeitungen and Entwu¨ rfe zum Zweiten Band der Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften (ca. 1870–1895), Gesammelte Schriften 19, 2nd, revised ed. (Go¨ttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    6.Dilthey, Wilhelm. (1989). Selected Works, Vol. 1: Introduction to the Human Sciences, translated by Rudolf A. Makkreel. Princeton.

    7.Dilthey, Wilhelm. (2002). The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences, trans. Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    8.Heidegger, Martin. (1978). Anmerkungen zu Karl Jaspers “Psychologie der eltanschauungen,” in Wegmarken, 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann,

    9.Heidegger, Martin. (1982). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. trans. Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

    1. Heidegger, Martin. (1985). Pha¨nomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles, Gesamtausgabe Band 61. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
    2. Heidegger, Martin. (1992). The Concept of Time, trans. William McNeill. Oxford: Blackwell.
    3. Heidegger, Martin. (1993). Grundprobleme der Pha¨nomenologie, Gesamtausgabe Band 58. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
    4. Heidegger, Martin. (1999). Die Idee der Philosophie und das Weltanschauungsproblem,’ in Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie, Gesamtausgabe Band 56/57, 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
    5. Heidegger, Martin. (2002). Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyound. Ed. John Van Buren. State University of New York Press.
    6. Heidegger, Martin. (2008). Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Trans. Ted Sadler. Continuum
    7. Husserl, Edmund. (2001). Logical Investigations, Volume 2. Routledge.
    8. Makkreel, Rudolf. (2016). Wilhelm Dilthey. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL=<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/dilthey/>.
    9. Owensby, Jacob. (1987). Dilthey's Conception of the Life-Nexus, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Volume 25, Number 4, pp. 557-572.
    10. Scharff, Robert C. (1997). Heidegger’s “Appropriation” of Dilthey before Being and Time, Journal for the History of Philosophy 35, pp. 105–28.
    11. Scharff, Robert C. (2013). Becoming a philosopher: What Heidegger learned from Dilthey, 1919–25, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21:1, 122-142.
    12. Scharff, Robert. (1997). Heidegger’s “Appropriation” of Dilthey before Being and Time. Journal for the History of Philosophy 35, pp. 105–28.
    13. Scharff, Robert. C. (2019). Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological: Interpreting Husserl Through Dilthey 1916-1925. Rowman & Littlefield
    14. Schatzki, Theodore R. (2003). Living Out of the Past: Dilthey and Heidegger on Life and History, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 46:3, 301-323.
    15. Simmel, Georg. (2010). The View of Life: Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms. Trans. John A. Y. Andrews and Donald N. Levine. The University of Chicago Press.
    16. Theodore Kisiel, (1986) ‘Das Entstehen des Begriffsfeldes “Faktizita¨t” im Fru¨hwerk Heideggers,’ Dilthey-Jahrbuch fu¨r Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften
    17. Van Buren, John. (2002). From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. State University of Newyork Press.